Interoperability

Presentation: GIM-CCSS Overview (NCES MIS Conference, February 14, 2013)

This presentation was delivered by Doug Levin, SETDA Executive Director, as part of a concurrent session entitled "Data Standards for Content: Granular Learning Standards, Learning Resources" at the 2012 NCES MIS Conference on February 14, 2013.

Upload

FOR PUBLIC REVIEW: GIM-CCSS: Scope, Technical Requirements, Approaches, and Recommendations (Feb 6, 2013 v 0.8 by Dan Rehak)

Updated based on GIM-CCSS Working Group and Project Team feedback received as of publication date (Feb 6, 2013).

Please feel free to raise comments, questions or issues by selecting the "Add New Comment" button below.

Upload

Entering a New Phase of the GIM-CCSS Project

It is with great pleasure that I can share with you that the GIM-CCSS project, designed to help ensure fidelity in the digital implementation of the Common Core, is moving to a new phase today with the public release of our first draft document for stakeholder review:

GIM-CCSS Public Water Cooler

The purpose of the GIM-CCSS Public 'Water Cooler' is to provide a virtual space for interested stakeholders to post general comments or questions not related to the review of specific work products (which will each have dedicated discussion areas), but rather on other general or related topics of interest/concern. Please post any comment or questions by selecting the 'Add New Comment' button below and following directions.

Ensuring Educational Technology Meets the Needs of Students Today – and Tomorrow: NASBE Report

Ensuring Educational Technology Meets the Needs of Students Today – and Tomorrow

NASBE Report National Association of State Boards of Education

Upload

New Group Launched: Granular Identifiers and Metadata for the Common Core (GIM-CCSS)

As previously announced, the Partnership for the Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC), the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (Smarter Balanced) and the State Educational Technology Directors Association (SETDA) – working in partnership with the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO) – have launched a collaborative, state-centric project (“Granular

Paving the Way for the Digital Implementation of the Common Core: NGA-CCSSO release and GIM-CCSS

Dear Colleagues,

Last week, the National Governors Association (NGA) and the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO) released digital identifiers and XML to help states, districts, technology companies and publishers to align educational resources in a uniform manner to the Common Core State Standards (CCSS). For more information, see: http://www.corestandards.org/common-core-state-standards-official-identifiers-and-xml-representation. This is a significant step forward in paving the way for the digital implementation of the Common Core and a recognition of the increasingly important role technology is playing in K-12 teaching, learning and assessment.

Just Announced: Granular Identifiers and Metadata for the Common Core State Standards (GIM-CCSS) Project

Granular Identifiers and Metadata for the Common Core State Standards (GIM-CCSS)

Whither Technology?

“Never mistake a clear view for a short distance.” – Paul Saffo, Futurist

In 1996, President Bill Clinton in his State of the Union address challenged the nation to ensure – as a matter of educational equity and opportunity – that every classroom be connected to the Internet and equipped with computers, good software, and well-trained teachers. In response, the federal government launched a concerted effort focused on wiring and equipping schools, teacher professional development, classroom-level integration of technology, and student technology literacy skills. This national strategy ultimately struggled to maintain political will and, by 2011, the Obama administration and Congress agreed that other priorities for federal education policy were greater, bringing an end to the beginning of the modern movement to employ technology as a school improvement and reform strategy.

Indeed, educators and education policymakers have had and continue to maintain a complex and fickle relationship with technology and with those who promote its use as a component of school improvement and reform strategies. Yet, as the pace of technological innovation continues to drive fundamental changes in the personal, civic, and professional lives of many Americans, it is hard to imagine how public K-12 education could be immune to its influence or why that would even be desirable, particularly in the face of a college- and career-readiness agenda, bolstered by the implementation of the Common Core State Standards. College students rely on technology for academic success and to improve personal productivity. In the workplace, everyone from mechanics to accountants to physicians depends on technology to conduct work, grow businesses, and collaborate with colleagues – both locally and globally.

Looking ahead, what is at issue is not whether technology has influenced or will influence education. Rather, the issues at hand are how, how fast, and whether this influence will help us achieve our stated goals and values for public education or something altogether different. In fact, if we, as a nation, are serious about preparing all students for college and careers, a concerted effort will be required to re-establish a shared vision for technology’s role in education policy and to attend – in a systemic and sustained manner – to good implementation.

Subscribe via RSS Syndicate content