Common Core Standards

GIM-CCSS Public Water Cooler

The purpose of the GIM-CCSS Public 'Water Cooler' is to provide a virtual space for interested stakeholders to post general comments or questions not related to the review of specific work products (which will each have dedicated discussion areas), but rather on other general or related topics of interest/concern. Please post any comment or questions by selecting the 'Add New Comment' button below and following directions.

District Professional Learning System Readiness Assessment: CCSS

Washington created a District Professional Learning System Readiness Assessment: CCSS. This “readiness assessment” is a tool to help districts assess their system specifically in the area of PD. It is meant to serve as a formative tool for school districts to identify where they are in building comprehensive professional learning systems that are necessary to support implementation of initiatives that will involve significant attention to staff development, such as the CCSS.

Common Core Implementation Workbook

 

This is the digital copy of the workbook provided to each team.

Achieve and the U.S. Education Delivery Institute have developed a practical Common Core Implementation Workbook for all states.

Upload

Comparison of Tri-State Rubrics and OER Rubrics

OER Rubrics: http://www.achieve.org/oer-rubrics

Tri-State Rubrics and EQuIP Initiative: http://www.achieve.org/EQuIP

These different rubrics are intended for different audiences and purposes.  The document below describes the differences.

Upload

Professional Development Sub-Group: Brainstorming Notes from October 16, 2012

These notes reflect our brainstorming discussion around PD needed for upcoming assessments. The areas highlighted in yellow reflect things we thought should move forward.

Upload

Whither Technology?

“Never mistake a clear view for a short distance.” – Paul Saffo, Futurist

In 1996, President Bill Clinton in his State of the Union address challenged the nation to ensure – as a matter of educational equity and opportunity – that every classroom be connected to the Internet and equipped with computers, good software, and well-trained teachers. In response, the federal government launched a concerted effort focused on wiring and equipping schools, teacher professional development, classroom-level integration of technology, and student technology literacy skills. This national strategy ultimately struggled to maintain political will and, by 2011, the Obama administration and Congress agreed that other priorities for federal education policy were greater, bringing an end to the beginning of the modern movement to employ technology as a school improvement and reform strategy.

Indeed, educators and education policymakers have had and continue to maintain a complex and fickle relationship with technology and with those who promote its use as a component of school improvement and reform strategies. Yet, as the pace of technological innovation continues to drive fundamental changes in the personal, civic, and professional lives of many Americans, it is hard to imagine how public K-12 education could be immune to its influence or why that would even be desirable, particularly in the face of a college- and career-readiness agenda, bolstered by the implementation of the Common Core State Standards. College students rely on technology for academic success and to improve personal productivity. In the workplace, everyone from mechanics to accountants to physicians depends on technology to conduct work, grow businesses, and collaborate with colleagues – both locally and globally.

Looking ahead, what is at issue is not whether technology has influenced or will influence education. Rather, the issues at hand are how, how fast, and whether this influence will help us achieve our stated goals and values for public education or something altogether different. In fact, if we, as a nation, are serious about preparing all students for college and careers, a concerted effort will be required to re-establish a shared vision for technology’s role in education policy and to attend – in a systemic and sustained manner – to good implementation.

Whither Technology?

“Never mistake a clear view for a short distance.” – Paul Saffo, Futurist

In 1996, President Bill Clinton in his State of the Union address challenged the nation to ensure – as a matter of educational equity and opportunity – that every classroom be connected to the Internet and equipped with computers, good software, and well-trained teachers. In response, the federal government launched a concerted effort focused on wiring and equipping schools, teacher professional development, classroom-level integration of technology, and student technology literacy skills. This national strategy ultimately struggled to maintain political will and, by 2011, the Obama administration and Congress agreed that other priorities for federal education policy were greater, bringing an end to the beginning of the modern movement to employ technology as a school improvement and reform strategy.

Indeed, educators and education policymakers have had and continue to maintain a complex and fickle relationship with technology and with those who promote its use as a component of school improvement and reform strategies. Yet, as the pace of technological innovation continues to drive fundamental changes in the personal, civic, and professional lives of many Americans, it is hard to imagine how public K-12 education could be immune to its influence or why that would even be desirable, particularly in the face of a college- and career-readiness agenda, bolstered by the implementation of the Common Core State Standards. College students rely on technology for academic success and to improve personal productivity. In the workplace, everyone from mechanics to accountants to physicians depends on technology to conduct work, grow businesses, and collaborate with colleagues – both locally and globally.

Looking ahead, what is at issue is not whether technology has influenced or will influence education. Rather, the issues at hand are how, how fast, and whether this influence will help us achieve our stated goals and values for public education or something altogether different. In fact, if we, as a nation, are serious about preparing all students for college and careers, a concerted effort will be required to re-establish a shared vision for technology’s role in education policy and to attend – in a systemic and sustained manner – to good implementation.

Decadence and Togetherness in July

When I was a teacher, July was an interesting month.  I tended to travel, read and be somewhat decadent.  I had done some reflection on what kinds of things worked well in the prior year and made note of that, but had not yet gone so far as to plan for the next year.  As a district technology coordinator, my July was a little different in that I had started to pull together what kinds of professional development I was going to provide in August and the plan for the overall year.

Subscribe via RSS Syndicate content