Alternate Assessments

assets presentation

jesse's assets presentation

Upload

Comparability of Computer-Adaptive and Paper-Pencil Tests

Hong Wang, et al.  March 2010

This article compares compter-adaptive testing with computer-based tests, examines issues of reliability and validity, and compares them with paper-pencil tests.

http://www.PearsonAssessments.com/Comparability

 

Race to the Top Assessment Consortia

There are four consortia in the Race to the Top Assessment Program.  Membership may change over time:

Partnership for the Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC).  PARCC is an alliance of 24 states to create a system that has three through-course assessments given throughout the year and an end-of-the-year comprehensive assessment in English/language arts and math.

http://www.parcconline.org/

Consideration for Developing Test Specifications for Common Core Assessments: Adopting Curriculum Standards—Only the First Step

Much of this paper focuses on the standards, while addressing the content issues to be explored and resolved in order to design assessment systems, particularly item development and test design.  Understanding the relationship between curriculum standards and test specifications, defined as “guidelines for the development of sound and effective items and tests”, is critical for assessment design.

http://www.PearsonAssessments.com/TestSpecs

Universal Design for Computer-based Testing: (UD-CBT) Guidelines, October 2010

The Universal Design for Computer-based Testing provides a framework that can be applied to assessment design.  This highly technical paper provides definitions, ways to apply the guidelines, and the guidelines themselves in a tiered system of test design and delivery.  Much of this paper draws attention to the test design and variance as a means of constructing content to better assess students’ abilities appropriately enhanced by the role of digital technology.  This paper is sponsored by Pearson. 

Subscribe via RSS Syndicate content